We need to talk about…Moving to Murrayfield

  • Only 4 free weekends remaining before the end of the season
  • Using 6 Nations weekend would strip sides of 30 Scottish internationals
  • European weekends may not be available
  • Alternative stadia present significant issues around timing, insurance and staffing

The news that the second leg of the 1872 Cup has had to be moved to Murrayfield will cause a fair bit of inconvenience for the club’s fans and will work against a Warriors side already under pressure from a slow start to the season.

The 2015/16 season was always going to be congested due to the Rugby World Cup. The Pro 12 is already a week behind and the final week in January (which is normally a rest weekend prior to the Six Nations kicking off) is being used to catch up. This leave just 5 weekends potentially free between now and the last regular season fixture (with the league unlikely to allow a game to be played after this final round). To add to their difficulties the Warriors have already seen 2 league fixtures postponed with the Leinster home game now being played during the international window and the Zebre game still to be rescheduled – therefore they only have 4 free dates.

The remaining available weekends are:

w/end 5/6/7 Feb – Six Nations weekend, Scotland v England

w/end 11/12/13 Mar – Six Nations weekend, Scotland v France

w/end 8/9/10 April – European tournament quarter finals

w/end 22/23/24 April – European tournament quarter finals

Rescheduling the 1872 Cup 2nd leg for a Six Nations weekend would leave the farcical situation of one of Scotland’s 2 big club games being played without around 30 Scottish internationals. Glasgow are already having to cope with being shorthanded more than half their league games, including 6 of their 8 fixtures against the other perennial playoff contenders (Leinster, Munster, Ospreys and Ulster). The Warriors will in all likelihood have been handicapped to a larger degree by international call-ups than their great rivals and the league will have lost out on some of the biggest clashes of the year. Having Scottish rugby’s showcase facing the same treatment would be bad news for both clubs and their followers and yet another game without their biggest names would be more of a disadvantage for the Warriors than playing a ‘home’ game at Murrayfield.

Postponing the game and holding off naming a replacement date in the hope that one of the European weekends would become free would be fraught with risk. It may take an unlikely series of results for Glasgow to make the latter stages of the European Cup but at this stage it is still not impossible. It looks more probable than not that Edinburgh will progress from their group in the Challenge Cup, taking out the first of the free weekends in April. That being the case it’s then down to the result of a one-off game whether the remaining April date remains free – and with only 2 weeks to confirm final arrangements. If Edinburgh were to match their achievements from last season then the remaining 1872 Cup fixture would be relegated to a midweek afterthought that would suit neither the players nor the fans.

Other than arranging an alternative date the only other option is to find another venue. Practically speaking it’s difficult to see how arrangements could be made (particularly given the time of year) to use somewhere on the scale of Hampden or Ibrox which is owned by a third party. For example how to arrange sufficient security and other staffing to open the stadium; obtain insurance; and ensure the pitch was suitably prepared?

Rugby Park and Broadwood are both synthetic surfaces and of sufficient size for the 6.5k + tickets sold. However both are in use on the 2nd of January so using them would require moving the game to Sunday the 3rd (at the earliest). And again there is the issue of obtaining agreement from the owner of the grounds (where is the benefit to them of hosting the game at such short notice?) allied to the staffing and insurance problems.

Would the change of date and travelling to Cumbernauld or Kilmarnock be any better than using the existing date and the superior transport links to Edinburgh? Unfortunately the west of Scotland does not have many stadia of the appropriate size and with suitable facilities to accommodate the Warriors – one of the reasons why Scotstoun will be the club’s home for many seasons to come despite its restrictions.

The unavailability of Scotstoun is an unfortunate situation but one which required a decision to be made and Murrayfield appears to be the least worst option. Given 21 of the matchday 23 have played at the national stadium on multiple occasions there should be no excuse for the players not to put in the kind of performance they are capable of.

Advertisements

6 comments

  1. Ach we’ll look back on it later on in 2016 and smile at how the extra game at Murrayfield helped acclimatise the team for the PRO12 Final….

    Seriously the players, as you rightly state, should have the experience and nous to handle the switch without batting an eyelid. It’s the Warriors support who may not now be able to make it across to the east on successive weekends that will feel the change most.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I feel really sorry for anyone who can’t make it – I know how much I’ve been looking forward to it. Unfortunately anything other than playing at Scotstoun on the original date was always going to screw things up for a lot of people.

      Like

  2. Disco,
    take it you mean Cumbernauld as opposed to Coatbridge re Broadwood. Whatever,r still think this decision is a real slap in the face for fans and based on TV revenue over team ambition. Another loss will effectively finish the season for us.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Aye brainfart there – fixed now thanks! Just hard to see what else could be done. And given the Sky deal isn’t that much money the costs of putting on transport and refunding tickets because of going to Murrayfield could be as much as they’d have lost if it couldn’t be shown on TV. The win is the thing now so it’s down to the players to give everyone something to cheer about!

      Like

  3. How we feeling about this one now?? I thought it was a bad idea at the time, def think if it was a home game we would have won. But I understand the drivers, convenience/least-worst option and/or other conspiracy theories centred on SRU, so don’t think there was ever going to be an easy option.

    That said, we should only ever play in dry conditions – holding onto the ball seems to be quite the rare skill these days! 😮

    Like

    1. Yep new rule – any sign of rain and we stay inside! All things considered that game was still there to be won in the first half (should have been out of sight) and at the very end. Could be costly come the end of the season.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s